Abstract rules and instructions
The rules and instructions
should be followed carefully.
Failure to
comply with abstract submission rules will result in the abstract not
being accepted for review.
*Please note that the rules set out below apply to Poster/Platform
abstract submission only. Invited speakers should refer to instructions
provided directly from the Congress Secretariat for the
submission of abstracts for invited lectures.
Submission rules
Content rules
Abstract submission fee
Instructions for the online
submission system
Travel bursary
information
Submission Rules
• Abstracts will not be accepted unless
they are submitted online
via the congress website before midnight (GMT), Friday 16th January 2009.
Late abstracts will NOT be accepted. Abstracts submitted by post, fax
or email will not be considered.
• All abstracts should be written,
submitted and
presented in English with a maximum word count of 250 words (not
including the abstract title, authors and institutions).
• All correspondence will be sent to the
submitting
author only. It is the responsibility of the submitting author to
forward any relevant correspondence to the presenting author.
• The first name in each abstract should
be that of
the presenting author. Submission of more than one abstract by the same
first author is not permitted.
• Each author is permitted to present
once (not including invited lectures).
• Authors will be notified in writing in
early 2009
whether or not their abstract has been approved by the Scientific
Advisory Committee (SAC). The decision of the SAC is final and no
correspondence will be entered into.
• Once an abstract has been approved, the
presenting
author must register for the Congress for final acceptance.
Abstracts will only receive final acceptance if the presenting author
has registered for the entire Congress. Day registrations will not be
permitted.
• All presenting authors are expected to
attend the
congress. Non-registered presenting authors may be excluded from
publication in the congress final programme and the online Epilepsia supplement.
• All abstracts accepted for presentation
at the
congress will be published, subject to editorial review, as an online supplement
of Epilepsia.
• Instructions for both platform and
poster
presentations will be available on the congress website. Abstracts
selected for oral presentations may use either Microsoft PowerPoint (PC
Format) or standard VHS video only.
• Young Investigator Award applications
will be
accepted from people under 45 years of age who have submitted an
abstract. Application procedures are available on the Awards section of
the website.
Submission
Fee
• An abstract submission fee of 50 EUR
must be paid
at the time of abstract submission. This non-refundable fee will be
automatically deducted from the congress registration fee.
• Abstract submitted without
the fee will not be reviewed by the Scientific Advisory Committee
• Abstract authors whose full
registration fee will be covered by a
third party will be reimbursed the abstract submission fee after the
congress.
Content
rules
• Abstract submitters should ensure that
the version
sent is the final one, changes will not be permitted.
• Institution information should be
provided for all
authors. Including institution, city, state/province and country but
excluding department, division, laboratory, etc.
• Abstracts should be structured in 4
sections:
1. Purpose
2. Method
3. Results
4. Conclusion
The "Purpose"
section should indicate the objectives of the work being presented.
The "Method"
section should
describe study material or subjects (e.g. number and type of patients),
intervention and evaluation procedures.
The "Results"
section should
summarise the main findings. Wherever possible, give numerical values,
including means with SD or SEM, and statistical significance or
confidence intervals.
The "Conclusion"
section should state briefly the conclusions reached in the work.
• Figures, tables and other illustrations
should not be included.
• Where appropriate, the ethics committee that has
approved the study should be named.
• If the work was supported by
funds provided by a
commercial organisation this should be stated in a short acknowledgment
at the end of the abstract. Other sources of funding may be
acknowledged in the same way.
• Submission of abstracts describing data
that have
previously been published in any scientific journal is not permitted.
• Multiple submissions of abstracts
describing
different components of the same study is not appropriate. All findings
generated from the same study should be included in a single abstract.
• Abstracts containing single case
reports will not
usually be accepted, unless the report is of outstanding scientific or
clinical interest because of the uniqueness of the findings or the
sophistication of the investigations.
• Abstracts containing data considered to
be insufficiently informative will not be accepted.
• Authors should use a concise title that
indicates
the content of the abstract. The title should not exceed 240
characters. Abbreviations should be avoided in the title.
• For intervention studies (for example,
therapeutic
trials), type of design (prospective or retrospective, controlled or
uncontrolled, randomised or observational, open vs. single-blind vs.
double-blind), dosages, assessment methods and duration of follow-up
should be specified.
• Non-proprietary names of drugs must be
used
throughout. If results are considered to be specific for a given
proprietary product (for example, bio-equivalence studies), the
non-proprietary name must still be used, followed by the proprietary
name and the name of the manufacturers in brackets.
• Abbreviations should be used sparingly.
For words
that are abbreviated, use the whole term the first time, followed by
the standard abbreviation in parenthesis. For anti-epileptic drugs,
standard abbreviations are those published in Epilepsia 1993; 34:1151.
• References should be used sparingly.
They should be
included within the text in brackets. For journals, mention first
author "et al" followed by the name of the journal as abbreviated in
the Index Medicus, year, volume number and inclusive pages (i.e. Hardus
P et al. Epilepsia 2001;42:262-267.). For book chapters, give first
author "et al", editor, title, publisher, city of publication, year and
inclusive pages (i.e. Levy RH et al. In: Levy RH et al, Antiepileptic
Drugs. Lippincott-Raven, 1996;13-30.).
• Submission of an abstract automatically
implies
acknowledgment that the work described was conducted in accordance with
current ethical standards and regulations in biomedical research.
Failure to adhere to these standards will result in rejection of the
abstract.